Comment

• situs bersama 07.03.2017

  You actually make it appear really easy along with your presentation but
  I to find this topic to be actually something which I believe I'd never
  understand. It kind of feels too complex and extremely wide for me.
  I am taking a look ahead in your subsequent put up, I will attempt
  to get the cling of it!
• erfahren Sie hier mehr 07.03.2017

  Stattdessen sei der Kommunismus oft nichts weiter als „Faschismus mit einem menschlichen Gesicht“.
  
  erfahren Sie hier mehr Er geht auf einen Erlass des damaligen Landesfürsten, Erzbischofs Friedrich III.
  nützliche Seite „Kein im christlichen Glauben stehender Deutscher kann, ohne der guten und sauberen Sache des Freiheitskampfes
  der deutschen Nation gegen den jüdischen antichristlichen Weltbolschewismus
  untreu zu werden, die staatlichen Maßnahmen gegen die Juden im Reich, insbesondere die
  Einziehung jüdischer Vermögenswerte bejammern. dryot.com
• Facebook Video Mp3 Download 07.03.2017

  Though, to maintain our product & services, our users can make donations.
• google 07.03.2017

  Google: Ethical Concerns
  Google's early and strong commitment to their users and informal corporate mission to "Do No Evil" or to "Don't be evil" has gained them wide trust.
  
  
  
  While their web search technology is well known, Google specializes in general data
  indexing. As a trusted and centralized source of information on the
  web, Google has assumed immeasurable power. Now as a publicly traded corporation with over three thousand
  employees, Google must assume a great responsibility to their
  users, to deliver fair and relevant results and
  to protect privacy at all costs.
  
  As their user base grows and their popularity increases,
  decisions at Google will not come without ethical consequences.
  The node ranking technology, dubbed PageRank, is used in some form to rank web
  pages, news articles, images, and user documents.
  It appears at first glance to be a democratic system, but it is a flawed one.
  
  Under most democratic systems, votes are weighted equally.
  PageRank, however, is mathematically inclined to give
  more power to relevant pages. To Google's credit, since web pages frequently contain more than one link and thus vote more than once, the page's total importance is at least disseminated
  among its links.
  
  In spite of Google's patents giving away much of the ranking
  method, certain variables and factors remain a secret and draw skepticism to the impartiality of the ranking scheme.
  Further, it is known that scrubbing mechanisms other
  than PageRank prepare the search results for their
  final display on Google's web page.
  Among the further scrubbing methods of search results, one that I found most surprising is that Google censors search results in China, France, and Germany.
  
  While I was aware that the targeted material is illegal in those countries, I had previously interpreted Google's "Do No Evil" attitude to include objecting to
  authoritarian one party states and Third Reich-inspired censorship.
  
  
  It would be virtuous of Google and would further general human knowledge if they were to insist
  on the mass dissemination of information to all people of the world.
  Google is free to run their web search from the United States and freely put
  material on the web outside of the jurisdiction of China, France, or Germany,
  and in fact their Chinese operation is based in the United States.
  
  
  In the case of China, however, practicality won out over virtue when the Chinese censors completely banned
  Google. If the search engine was to have any Chinese
  user base whatsoever, in the interest of their ultimate goal of putting the user first, they needed to comply.
  
  
  While no concrete information is available on how much Google colluded with the Chinese, they did comply with the censors, restoring access to the
  Chinese citizens. When not legally obliged to censor results,
  Google strives for impartiality but leave many questions unanswered.
  
  In a letter titled "An explanation of our search results," Google explains why offensive results can occur for seemingly inoffensive search terms, how "search results are generated completely objectively and are independent of the beliefs and preferences of those who work at Google." Further, the letter recognizes petitions that requested the removal of hate sites, but Google notes that they only omit sites they are "legally compelled to remove or those maliciously attempting to manipulate [their] results." These
  claims appear promising and it is quite believable that Google does not omit results,
  but it is commonly known that certain factors of exact rankings are still hidden from the public.
  
  
  Google officials recently leaked to the public that they had an internal ethics committee that is
  periodically in charge of altering the PageRank algorithm.
  I expected privacy and ethics employees to be found at a company of Google's size, but what I didn't expect to find is that the
  committee is merely an informal gathering of employees interested in ethics.
  
  To ensure impartiality and to form trust in Google's ethical decisions, they need an official ethics
  committee with training, experience, and direction. Without public statements from
  Google's official ethics committee as to how they change the algorithm and what criteria they follow in doing so, the impartiality of PageRank is under suspicion.
  When complex technology delivers trusted results,
  as with government cryptographic standards, complete transparency can often be
  an ideal way to ensure impartiality.
  
  In the case of Google, however, complete transparency has immediate downfalls.
  Because achieving genuine relevancy is difficult and
  cheating the system is considerably easier, PageRank has become a dynamic target for
  malicious webmasters who consistently overcome
  the latest algorithm tweaks to achieve high rankings for irrelevant
  pages.
  
  Delivering usable search results consists not
  only of identifying the relevant pages to place near the top
  of the rankings, but also of identifying junk or spam pages in order to place those results near the bottom.
  With these facts in place, I learned an important lesson: complete
  transparency of Google's ranking methods would result in direct widespread manipulation, rendering the results irrelevant and denying the technology its usefulness.
  
  
  If the PageRank specifications were to somehow assume complete and deserved trust of
  their impartiality from the public, I would still hold several issues with their nature.
  
  First, PageRank likens the web to a popularity contest.
  
  Resembling a student body election, Google is often guilty of
  burying the most relevant and useful results simply
  because no one has noticed them yet.
  Second, if ideological bias does exist in the
  news media, then I consider PageRank to be culpable in perpetuating it.
  Many theories of media bias are based around the concept of an echo chamber of unpopular but powerfully backed opinion that drowns out an unbiased or otherwise
  popular opinion. PageRank is perfectly suited for creating such an echo chamber,
  in that when a news search returns hundreds of pages, most
  Google users read the first few and do not ensure that the other 99% corroborate.
  
  
  Google has become a substantial news source and plays a part in telling the web which stories are relevant, when in fact the web should be telling Google what
  is relevant. The same issue holds for normal web searches; when Google
  was a relatively unknown outside observer to the social interactions on the web, PageRank
  was fresh and promising.
  As Google slowly begins arbitrating these interactions by dictating what
  is relevant to trusting masses, PageRank could become stale and merely project importance on its own monstrous creations.
  
  For many of these issues, the time for true remedies is
  over. Google cannot go back to a 50 employee company and
  embrace a proper ethics committee, and they cannot go back to a Stanford dorm
  room and better democratize PageRank technology.
  
  Worse yet, Google will likely never be a non-profit organization with only its users
  truly in mind; the responsibility of a publicly traded company
  like Google is to its stakeholders. The company
  is faced with the challenging task of gaining public trust in its technologies through transparency or other
  means, while skeptical users are faced with an even more
  difficult choice: whether to boycott the most useful search technology in history.
  
  
  
  References
  BBC News. "10 things the Google ethics committee could discuss." May 20,
  2004. website Brandt, Daniel. "PageRank: Google's Original Sin." Google Watch, Public
  Information Research, Inc. August 2002. website Elgin, Ben. "Google's Chinese Wall." BusinessWeek Online, The McGraw-Hill Companies Inc.
  
  September 30, 2004. website nf20040930_3318_db046.htm Garfinkel,
  Simson. Database Nation: The Death of Privacy in the 21st Century.
  O'Reilly and Associates, Inc. 2001. Google. "An explanation of our search results." 2004.
  website Google. "Google Code of Conduct." August 18, 2004.
  
  
  website Google. "Media Coverage." website Newton, Jon.
  "Google and the Chinese Government." TechNewsWorld,
  September 22, 2004 6:00 AM PT. website Orlowski, Andrew. "Google's Ethics Committee Revealed." The Register.
  May 17, 2004. website Orlowski, Andrew.
  
  "Google values its own privacy. How does it value yours?"
  The Register. April 13, 2004. website Rogers, Ian. "The Google PageRank Algorithm and How It Works." IPR Computing Ltd.
  website Våge, Lars. "China's search engine censorship continues." InternetBrus.
  February 27, 2005.
  
  website Wikipedia. "Google." May 27, 2005 website Xia, Bill.
  "Google Chinese News censorship demonstrated." Dynamic Internet Technology Inc.
  September 16, 2004. website Zittrain, Jonathan and Edelman, Benjamin. "Localized Google search result exclusions - Statement of issues and call for Data." Berkman Center for Internet & Society, Harvard Law School.
  
  October 26, 2002. website
• www.Mybabymoves.Com 07.03.2017

  Nous sommes bien nombreux, mais plus nombreux encore sont les casinos en ligne français qui proposent des jeux
  d’argent. http://www.Mybabymoves.Com D’après le rapport de notre collègue Michèle
  Bonneton sur les crédits affectés à La Poste dans le projet de loi de finances initial pour 2014 (199), le
  nombre total de MSP avoisinerait 450. luxuriousrentz.com
  Julie Valentin et Estelle Saada, « Grande distribution :
  le paradoxe de l'effet-prix », Économie rurale, nos 245-246, 1998, p.
  http://www.eionia.co.kr/home/bbs/board.php?bo_table=free&wr_id=126887
• bitchesgirlz 07.03.2017

  Hi there, after reading this awesome post i am as well
  glad to share my knowledge here with friends.
• bitchesgirlz 07.03.2017

  The willingness to learn and grow from mistakes promotes
  a culture of continuous improvement.
• http://mss02.gandme.kr 07.03.2017

  Ungeachtet der antisemitischen Attacken sind Juden in Deutschland weiter gut geschützt, glaubt
  der Präsident des Zentralrats, Schuster. http://mss02.gandme.kr Die Bezeichnung
  Pinctada fucada ist wissenschaftlich noch etwas unstabil.
  http://www.visualchemy.gallery ↑ Zivildienstschule Karlsruhe: Tschüss Zivi - Hallo Bufdi.
  
  https://s4core.online/am-21-mai-begann-der-stammheim-prozess/
• coopunion.nodong.net 07.03.2017

  1936: In Tokio wird Abe Sada von Polizisten festgenommen. coopunion.nodong.net Diese Datenschutzerklärung klärt Sie über die Art, den Umfang
  und Zweck der Verarbeitung von personenbezogenen Daten (nachfolgend kurz „Daten“) innerhalb unseres Onlineangebotes und der mit ihm
  verbundenen Webseiten, Funktionen und Inhalte sowie externen Onlinepräsenzen, wie z.B.
  http://www.jusarangchurch.com Von Beruf Uhrmacher. Deportationen: 24.
  wonjunlab.co.kr
• https://spmall.kr 07.03.2017

  C’est l’offre la plus attendue par les joueurs qui décident de rejoindre un casino en ligne France !
  https://spmall.kr Il existe différents types
  de bonus dans le monde virtuel, ci-dessous vous pouvez
  en lire plus à leur sujet. kanishkakumarrathore.com Grâce à des mini-jeux
  exclusifs, cet opérateur a su se faire une place de choix auprès des joueurs aguerris
  ou débutants. http://firsttop.co.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=free&wr_id=142769